Gender Stigma Of Girls Self Esteem Drops Dramatically...

Society has ascribed to women the negative gender stigma that they are weak and incapable. One obvious manifestation of this is the mocking phrase that someone does something, such as run, fight, or hit, â€Å"like a girl†. While most people say this phrase as a joke, it truly does have an effect on young girls. In the Always â€Å"Like a Girl† commercial, parent company Proctor and Gamble presents the statistic that girls self esteem drops dramatically during puberty (AlwaysBrand). Although Always is attempting a new tactic to reverse the negative gender stigmas of women by focusing on the core of the problem, puberty, the point in girls lives when they stop perceiving themselves as strong and capable, Always’ morals have flaws. Large advertisement campaigns like Always determine how well a product will sell based on the response from the viewers. These advertisements represent large marketing investments balanced by the hope of reaping high increases in resu lting sales. By juxtaposing the two ideas of the adolescent target market and the apparently feminist marketing campaign, this paper will examine the psychological changes during puberty and marketer’s focus on adolescent stigmas in an effort to demonstrate that the brand Always is not actually bringing a new face to feminism, just exploiting the issue for their own self-interested profit in sales. Always’ centers the storyboard of their commercial by portraying the differing views of girls that occur as they move through

American Revolution or Evolution Free Essays

Saroosh . H. Khan American Evolution or Revolution? The theme has been subject to excessive discussion over the course of more than two centuries encompassing the existence of the United States. We will write a custom essay sample on American Revolution or Evolution or any similar topic only for you Order Now Although it has been taught for as long in our schools and classrooms and all other educational institutions that the year 1776 Anno Domini marks the year of American Revolution, but amidst historians and intellectuals the dilemma to whether to call it a revolution or an evolution has never been out of question. Reader! Doesn’t it enthrall one that a single word could bifurcate scholars and create factions amongst the erudite. ?Por que (why? ) there must be a reason and there is! The answer is simple yet rational: Perspective. Albert Einstein, (the famous physicist) most remembered by his theory of relativity, concluded that distance and time were not absolute. History resides in the same niche. It is more than a chronological account of past events of a period or a livelihood or development of a people, an institution, or a place. But what it is not is absolute. It is always left upon interpretation, scrutiny, analysis, probing and pondering. The perception or perspective gained through such rigorous processes is also subject to the base of a historian. It is very uncommon to find historians sharing their bases of initial learning and therefore the effect of their own era, age, surroundings and upbringing must also be taken account of. A revolution, defined by Encyclopedia Britannica is: a major, sudden, and hence typically a violent alteration in government and in related associations and structures. On the other hand Oxford dictionary defines an evolution as: the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form. Let us decide upon the usage of the word Revolution, which one can venture out to say, could be dated from the year 1775 with its ignition being the battle of Lexington and Concord and culmination being the ratification of the constitution of the States in 1782. Seemingly easy doesn’t it? It doesn’t really respond to how fundamentally did the thoughts, ideals, ideology and mindset of a 2. 5 million inhabitants change and led to he chain of events that became known as the American Revolution. What I believe is that no people in the course of history have ever rebelled against a certain state, condition or ideology without a buildup of grievances, resentment or a gradual shift of attitude towards accepting a better socio-dogma. Let’s go back to the early 17th century when immigrations began to take place into the New Wo rld. Herds of folks comprising of German, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, Jewish descent and not to mention the French Huguenots, began pouring into the lands in order to escape from the fetters of the Old World. They did not have any more an appetite for its rituals, its doctrines, its curbing of civil liberties, and mostly the cost of living in it. One can even say at this particular time, that they were revolting as a denouement of the evolution of the aforementioned causes. So it would be appropriate to say that a 17th century Europe was in revolution. Let’s go further with this theory and say that the immigrants reaching the New World were revolutionaries. Almost 150 years of Pax Americana (used strictly in context with the time period and not according to current usage) so to say was enjoyed by the colonists. During this time, some changes irrevocably did take place. This is evident from the fact that the language that the majority of the immigrants originally spoke had evolved into a different dialect. So from this we can also entrust upon the belief that alongside linguistics political and socio-economic changes did also take place. A political change that actually began with the migrations was the rise of a political ideology known as Republicanism. Technically ruled by Great Britain or more accurately looked over, the colonies practiced the policy through their town halls and city councils. Very famous examples of such republican instruments were the Virginia House of Burgesses and the Massachusetts Assembly. These were regulated by either representative or direct democracy. The symbol of democracy at the time was looked upon as the House of Commons in England, however it did seem a bit more than contradicting to have the Buckingham Palace towering high in the very country. The colonists did give their allegiances to the monarch but because of the fact that it was kind of conditional. Although they did not realize it nor was it formally declared but they remained docile because they were never tampered by British legislations. They had during this time, created their own principles, created their own system of jurisprudence, law, justice, methods of trade, commerce, education, agriculture etc. When after the French and Indian war, the British began actively participating in the earlier enumerated colonial components of society; it would’ve obviously been not received glad handedly by the Colonists as it did not. Let’s now examine the economic evolution that took place to ensure America’s Independence. The 150 year old period was in terms of trade and commerce coined as a period of salutary neglect. For the colonists it brought economic prosperity and industrialization. For the British it was shooting themselves in the foot. Intentional lax in order to show the appreciation for economic freedom while regulating the policy of mercantilism. Does it make any sense? One would question Robert Walpole’s sanity between all of this; however he is not our subject of concern. What you shall so sow so shall you reap; a very old and passed around saying isn’t it? But it does make sense in the context. The British for a very long period of time followed the policy and the colonist enjoyed its benefits. Smuggling was nothing out of the blue, very common. Other European nations also benefitted from it, the Colonial agriculture products such as hay, wheat, barley, maize and cotton were valued highly in foreign markets. When the British annoyed at Colonial stubbornness to pay taxes, passed the writs of assistance; there was an outrage. There had to be one, like it did, smuggling was not put up with anymore and a flow of revenue generation created as a result of foreign trade stagnated. How were the merchants to run their businesses without the freedom of trading being allowed to them as it had always been? Hence there was an outcry by the merchants who went bankrupt as a result of such legislation. Ah! One cannot expect the theme to be talked about without the mentioning of taxes somewhere or another. The country was not at all familiar with taxes; once again it is necessary to mention that when we talk about being not being tampered for almost 150 years it is meant more than it sounds. Citizens in Britain were obliged to pay taxes, however their brethren in the New World were not. I do at times believe that absolute freedom corrupts absolutely, there should be some harnesses or bridles put on in order to let ivility root in or in this case for rule to sustain. When suddenly exposed to direct taxes such as Stamp Act and Sugar Acts why would it not cause havoc with in the colonists? It would lead to acrimony towards the crown like it did, it would lead to mass protests like it did and would lead to severing of ties like it did. In the beginning I wrote about how a historical event is su bject to independent interpretation. How historians may or may not agree on something because of the different elements molding the shape of the basis for their knowledge. I must confess that it is not arbitrary and applies to myself as it does to any other individual. I believe that evolution without revolution is lame and revolution without evolution blind, very similar to what Einstein said about religion and science. One thing is for certain though, nothing is by nature revolutionary. There has to be friction to beget fire. During the 150 year period evolutionary changes in political beliefs, social policies and economic mechanisms did take place otherwise the colonists would’ve never armed themselves to teeth and hoisted the flag of revolution. How to cite American Revolution or Evolution, Papers

Us Confederation Essays - United States, , Term Papers

Us Confederation The Articles of confederation were ratified in 1781 and became the first constitution if the United States of America. It provided a strong national government to make all states a single nation. The articles created a firm league of friendship, the articles had a national congress which consisted of two to seven delegates. The delegates were from each state and were in charge of foreign relations declaring war, peace, army and navy matters, issues, directives and to pass laws. The only problem was they could not enforce them. The articles denied congress the power of taxation a serious oversight in time of war. The national government could obtain funds only by asking states for contributions called requisitions, but if a state failed to cooperate which many did, congress went about everything with no financial support. Two good bits of legislation came out of the loose knit confederation. The first was the land ordinance of 1785. It set up the way land was owned by the federal government. That in which was basically the territory won from Britain that wasnt claimed by one of the states, and could be divided and sold. It called for townships to be divided into one square mile, or 640 acres, and sold at a public auction. Part of the revenue went to the establishment of public schools. The second was called the Northwest ordinance, in 1787. It stated that as new states were admitted to the country, they would be equal in every way to the original thirteen. It also banned slavery in the new territories, although this was later to be changed. Both laws were good starts to stabilizing the new country. But ongoing troubles in trying to regulate commerce between the states and in trying to raise money for the federal government still plagued the nation, especially since every state had its own currency and assigned it its own value. All in all, I feel that the articles of confederation was made to give the people more of an authority over the government and it was an attempt to let the people make their own rules, different from Britain. History

Free Essays on Freedoms Obligation

Freedom’s Obligation We have freedom today because of the veterans of war that have sacrificed their lives for us to live. Some have died to give us freedom. Some have been injured to never make their life the same again. Others have not been injured, and not died, but remember gruesome scenes that will haunt them forever. Many wars have been fought; many tears have been shed to give us the freedom we have today. In the Civil War the North fought the South for the freedom of the slaves. Early European settlers brought the slaves to America in the 1600s. Slaves were used to plant and harvest crops, clear land, build houses and shops, and do household chores. Slaves did all this and got nothing in return. The slaves deserved freedom, just like the rest of us. Even though these slaves deserved freedom, all throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the North and the South struggled to find a solution to the slavery issue. The warriors of the Civil War had hot lead shed through their bodies to give the slaves the freedom they have today. Without the Civil War, where would our government be today? Would blacks still be slaves? Would we have the great military status we have today? To show that you appreciate freedom that the United States provides, you should follow the law and do what the government thinks is right. Following the law means doing what is right and not doing things that are illegal. If you do things that are illegal you could get punished and lose the right to have freedom because you will be put in jail. If you do not do what is right and legal you could also get punished with fines, losing your license, or community service, or even much worse jail time and the death penalty. The flag of the United States symbolizes freedom throughout the world. When people look at the flag of the United States, they see freedom. The 13 stripes on the flag represent the original 13 colonies. The white ... Free Essays on Freedoms Obligation Free Essays on Freedoms Obligation Freedom’s Obligation We have freedom today because of the veterans of war that have sacrificed their lives for us to live. Some have died to give us freedom. Some have been injured to never make their life the same again. Others have not been injured, and not died, but remember gruesome scenes that will haunt them forever. Many wars have been fought; many tears have been shed to give us the freedom we have today. In the Civil War the North fought the South for the freedom of the slaves. Early European settlers brought the slaves to America in the 1600s. Slaves were used to plant and harvest crops, clear land, build houses and shops, and do household chores. Slaves did all this and got nothing in return. The slaves deserved freedom, just like the rest of us. Even though these slaves deserved freedom, all throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the North and the South struggled to find a solution to the slavery issue. The warriors of the Civil War had hot lead shed through their bodies to give the slaves the freedom they have today. Without the Civil War, where would our government be today? Would blacks still be slaves? Would we have the great military status we have today? To show that you appreciate freedom that the United States provides, you should follow the law and do what the government thinks is right. Following the law means doing what is right and not doing things that are illegal. If you do things that are illegal you could get punished and lose the right to have freedom because you will be put in jail. If you do not do what is right and legal you could also get punished with fines, losing your license, or community service, or even much worse jail time and the death penalty. The flag of the United States symbolizes freedom throughout the world. When people look at the flag of the United States, they see freedom. The 13 stripes on the flag represent the original 13 colonies. The white ...

Tax Deduction Tips for Classroom Teachers

Tax Deduction Tips for Classroom Teachers In a perfect world, school budgets would overflow with cash for the classroom. Teachers could buy all the supplies they need to optimally instruct their students. The words taxes, deductions, and receipts would apply only to our personal finances. Welcome to reality, teachers. Teaching in the 21st century means you are most likely cash-strapped and scrounging for even the most basic supplies. But if you spend even a dime of your own money to teach your students, you simply must save receipts and claim the costs on your taxes as a deduction. Even the IRS itself reminds teachers each year to claim their classroom expenses on their tax forms. How Teachers Can Minimize Their Personal Taxes You must work in public or private elementary or secondary schools for at least 900 hours as a teacher, instructor, counselor, principal or aide.You may deduct up to $250 of qualified expensesIt is recommended that you keep all of your receipts and documentation in a folder labeled Educator Deductions and the applicable year.Eligible supplies must be ordinary and necessary and they include unreimbursed costs for books, computer equipment including software and services, supplies, and other materials used in the classroom.You do not need to explicitly itemize the expenses. As you can see, its not particularly difficult or time-consuming to save a little money on your taxes with these education deductions. The hardest part is remembering to save receipts and immediately filing them in a single, well-labeled location that you will be able to easily find at tax time. If you have a hard time staying organized and managing the paper piles that come along with the teaching profession, check out these practical tips for winning the paper war in the classroom. Disclaimer: Consult your local tax professional to verify current tax laws in your state.

Proposal Outline Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Proposal Outline - Assignment Example No profits arise, as any surplus income over expenditure is paid as extra rebate to the Department of Defense, normally to service central funds. DEFCO is monetarily self-sufficient, has no assets or shareholders and provides no personal interests. No one has taken any stake in the organization [1]. DEFCO has self-service shops in all the military camps. In total, it has 29 shops, which provide services to Military Personnel. Initially it was created solely for service provision regardless of whether a branch was making profit or not. Over the years, it managed to adopt profit motives and achieve growth in both sales and profitability. It has also managed to expand its branch network to a maximum of 29 shops. The Managing Director of DEFCO working in collaboration with various Chief Officers is responsible for managing the organization. The DEFCO Board of Management exercises the daily operation of DEFCO through the Managing Director who is appointed by this board. The policy of DEFCO is in the hands of Council of Members who comprise the Chief of General staff as chairman, the Army, Commanders and the Managing Director of DEFCO act as members. The ICT department uses the centralized management technique. This makes is difficult to be able to sort a problem that arises in those shops that are located in distant places. This resulted to many problems being presented to the Help Desk, hence becoming difficult to tackle the problems all at once. Therefore, this technique is not efficient in solving of problems. The E-Business Suite is a new system, and a good number of the employees have the proper expertise of how to go about it. As a result, many mistakes are made and it takes time for those mistakes to be

Android Security Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Android Security - Research Paper Example The authors continue by stating that in fact, ICC mediation defines the core security structure and is the article’s focus, but it improves on the assurances provided by the underlying Linux system (Enck, Ongtang and McDaniel 53). The rest of the subtopic goes deep into the security enforcement element of the Android operating system, covering the mandatory access control (MAC) among other features. The next subtopic is security refinements, with a short introduction. Under this comes a discussion of public vs. private components, implicitly open components, broadcast intent permissions, content provider permissions, service hooks, protected APIs, permission protection levels, pending intents, and URI permissions (Enck, Ongtang and McDaniel 54). The final subtopic in the article is lessons in defining policy, which covers the results (experiences) the author have had after working with the Android security policy. They state that the results showed that Android security policy starts with a relatively simple easy-to-understand MAC enforcement model, but the number and subtlety of refinements make it hard for someone to discover an application’s policy by simply looking at it (Enck, Ongtang and McDaniel 56). Some refinements push policy into the application code while others add delegation, which combines discretionary controls into the otherwise typical MAC model (Enck, Ongtang and McDaniel 56). This scenario makes mustering a firm grasp on Android's security model non-trivial.